Arguing for logical realism and discussing the logical structure and constitution of the world.
Non omnes formulae significant quantitatem, et infiniti modi calculandi excogitari possunt. (Leibniz)
Thursday, January 11, 2024
What is a Set ?
A set is a tree. To specify a set we can list all the elements that belong to it and then all the elements that belong to each one of these elements and so forth (rigorously this is to be understood in terms of ordinals and assuming the axiom of choice). In Cohen's forcing technique there is the notion of a $P$-name, where $P$ is some set endowed with a preorder. A $P$-name is simply a set viewed as a tree but with each node labelled with an element of $P$. An ordinary set can be seen as a $P$-name with its tree's nodes tagged with the top element 1 of $P$. Given a $P$-name and a subset $G\subseteq P$ we can obtain a normal set by going through the tree and prunning off nodes whose labels do not belong to $G$ and then forgetting the labels and considering the resulting set - this is the interpretation or evaluation map. A particular case is in which $P$ is the set of all Borelian sets of the real interval $I$. A $P$ -name is then a probabilistically described set.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Detailed discussion of Shapshay's Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics (continuously updated)
We offer here a detailed analysis and critique of Sandra Shapshay's book Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics: Hope, Compassion and...
-
We cannot leave out time to begin with. Nor possibility, multiple times. A first attempt would be as follows. A system involves an input $I...
-
Chapter 4: Truth in Virtue of Intentionality, Or, The Return of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction The classical Kantian distinction betwee...
-
Take standard first-order semantics. Consider a model $M$ of a certain theory $T$. Now suppose that we wish to include a subset a $\Psi \su...
No comments:
Post a Comment