What defines the 'subjective' and the 'objective' ? Is it the nature of the domain itself or the mode, attitude and intention regarding such domains ? We might say that we normally have an objective attitude towards that which we usually call 'objective' and a subjective attitude (i.e. 'first-person' ) towards what we usually call 'subjective'. Philosophically we should investigate the 'objective' domain's dependence on the 'subjective' domain. But most importantly we should investigate (by a shift of perspective and attitude) the 'subjective' domain in a thoroughly objective manner, rather than subjectively as usual. This autoreification, autotranscendence (which is in fact both theoretical and practical) is what was possibly at the core of Husserl's phenomenology and at the same time totally at odds with subsequent phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism and postmodernism.
Arguing for logical realism and discussing the logical structure and constitution of the world.
Non omnes formulae significant quantitatem, et infiniti modi calculandi excogitari possunt. (Leibniz)
Tuesday, January 2, 2024
Beyond Subjective and Objective
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Detailed discussion of Shapshay's Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics (continuously updated)
We offer here a detailed analysis and critique of Sandra Shapshay's book Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics: Hope, Compassion and...
-
We cannot leave out time to begin with. Nor possibility, multiple times. A first attempt would be as follows. A system involves an input $I...
-
Chapter 4: Truth in Virtue of Intentionality, Or, The Return of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction The classical Kantian distinction betwee...
-
Take standard first-order semantics. Consider a model $M$ of a certain theory $T$. Now suppose that we wish to include a subset a $\Psi \su...
No comments:
Post a Comment